BSC
Rating Announcement · BIDV Securities Joint Stock Company · 17/12/2025
Source: VIS Rating
Rating Announcement BSC Securities

Rating Announcement

BIDV Securities Joint Stock Company

VIS Rating assigns first-time A+ issuer rating to BIDV Securities Joint Stock Company, stable outlook

KH
Ratings & Research Department
17/12/2025

Credit Rating Result

A+
Issuer rating
Stable
Outlook
Initial rating
Rating status

Hanoi, 17 December 2025 - VIS Rating has assigned a long-term issuer rating of A+ to BIDV Securities Joint Stock Company (BSI). The outlook on BSI’s A+ issuer rating is stable. This is the first time VIS Rating has assigned a rating to BSI.

SUMMARY OF KEY FACTORS

Extremely
weak
Very
weak
WeakBelow
average
AverageAbove
average
StrongVery
strong
Stand-alone Assessment
Risk appetite
Leverage
Profitability
Funding & Liquidity
LowModerateHighVery highExtremely high
Affiliate support
Government support
Source: VIS Rating

Rating rationale

The A+ long-term issuer rating reflects BSI’s above-average standalone assessment, supported by strong risk appetite, above-average profitability, funding and liquidity metrics. It also incorporates its average leverage compared to industry peers. The rating also incorporates our expectation of a moderate likelihood of extraordinary support from affiliates.
BSI was established in 1999 as one of the first two securities firms in Vietnam. Today, BSI is a mid-sized player with total assets of VND16.7 trillion as of 9M2025. The company operates under a traditional business model focused on retail brokerage and margin lending, and has expanded its suite of advisory services for institutional clients over the years. As a key subsidiary (52% stake) of one of Vietnam’s largest state-owned banks, Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development of Vietnam (BID), BSI and BID collaborate closely on group strategic initiatives. BSI’s other major shareholder is Hana Securities Co. Ltd. with a 35% equity stake. Since 2022, Hana Securities has provided technical assistance to develop BSI’s digital capabilities.
We view BSI’s ‘Strong’ risk appetite as a key credit strength, anchored by its conservative business strategy and significantly lower exposure to higher-risk assets than the industry average. Assets considered as higher-risk – includes corporate bonds (i.e., excluding bonds issued by financial institutions (FI)) and unlisted shares - have consistently amounted to around 5% of total assets over the past three years.
As of 9M2025, margin loans accounted for 50% of total assets, followed by treasury investments—primarily bonds issued by government and FIs (18%), term deposits and certificates of deposits (TDs and CDs, 15%), and listed shares (5%).
We assess that BSI’s asset risks from margin loans are well-managed, supported by its track record of disciplined risk management policies and processes. These include stringent customer eligibility criteria, risk assessment frameworks calibrated based on loan-to-value ratios and collateral valuations, and robust margin call processes. Credit concentration is modest, with the 20 largest margin loans comprising just 33% of the portfolio, below peer averages.
In addition, we view credit risks from corporate bond investments – around 4% of total assets as of 9M2025 - as manageable. This reflects the stringent selection of issuers with robust profitability and bonds supported by a high degree of collateralization. According to the management, none of their bond investments experienced any repayment issues over the past three years.
In 2026, BSI targets to grow its retail margin loans by over 10% year-on-year, mainly by leveraging BID’s nationwide customer network. We do not expect any material change in its risk appetite and exposure to higher-risk assets over the next 12-18 months.
We assess BSI’s profitability as ‘Above-Average’, supported by a three-year average ROAA of 4.7%, exceeding the peer average of 4.2%. This strength is primarily driven by low funding costs that underpin margin lending and treasury income. Over the past three years, BSI’s average funding cost was 4.6%, below the peer average of 5.1%.
In addition, BSI expanded margin lending faster than peers, with a three-year compound annual growth rate of 39%, higher than peers’ average of 29%. From 2023 to 9M2025, margin lending contributed more than half of operating profit, followed by investment income (37%)—mainly from CDs, TDs, and bonds—and brokerage income (6%).
Reduced reliance on listed equity trading has also lowered pre-tax earnings volatility to 45% as of 9M2025 from 50% in 2024, a credit positive. Income from equity investments declined to 5% of total operating income in 9M2025 from 9% in 2024.
Looking ahead, BSI plans to collaborate with BID to offer investment products – such as equities, bonds, CDs, fund certificates – to the bank’s customers, while accelerating digitalization to attract new customers and diversify offerings. These initiatives should support gradual improvement in earnings stability over the next 12–18 months.
We assess BSI’s funding and liquidity as ‘Above-Average’, underpinned by substantial liquid asset buffers, a well-diversified funding mix, and a proven ability to access low-cost funding from both onshore and offshore lenders.
BSI maintains strong funding flexibility, supported by sizeable and diversified credit facilities—including clean lines—from local banks and foreign institutions in Taiwan and Korea. Borrowings from retail and institutional clients further strengthen its funding profile, accounting for 11% of total funding as of 9M2025.
Liquidity risks are well-managed, with highly liquid assets—TDs, CDs, and financial-institution bonds—representing 38% of total assets, in line with the industry average. Over the past three years, BSI’s liquidity inflow-to-outflow ratio averaged 112%, above the industry norm of 105%.
According to management, BSI plans to diversify its funding structure through new bond issuance, targeting the issuance of up to VND 500 billion of 1Y senior unsecured bonds by the end of 2025.
We expect its funding and liquidity position to remain stable over the next 12–18 months, backed by robust liquid asset buffers and continued diversification efforts.
We assess BSI’s leverage as ‘Average’, reflecting its increased reliance on short-term borrowings to fund margin loan growth amid improving market sentiment. As of 9M2025, leverage ratio rose to 3.1x from 2.0x in 2024, above the industry average of 2.7x.
Management intends to retain capital through a non-cash dividend policy while pursuing moderate asset growth of around 10%. Coupled with robust profitability, we expect BSI’s leverage to remain broadly stable at current levels over the next 12–18 months.
BSI’s issuer rating incorporates an uplift for affiliate support, reflecting our expectation of a moderate likelihood of extraordinary support from BID in times of need. This view is underpinned by BID’s robust standalone creditworthiness and the close strategic alignment between the two affiliated companies.
BSI plays a key role in BID’s long-term strategy to transition from traditional banking to a diversified financial services ecosystem, leveraging the bank’s extensive customer base to offer a wide range of wealth management products. The two entities share a common management team, ensuring centralized governance and strategic coordination. Our assessment also considers BID’s significant ownership stake, BSI’s contribution to group profitability, and their shared brand identity, which collectively facilitate decision-making and reinforce integration.
The outlook on BSI’s long-term issuer rating is Stable, reflecting our expectation that its strong risk appetite and liquidity profile will remain intact as it executes retail-focused margin loan expansion over the next 12–18 months.

Factors That Could Lead to an Upgrade/Downgrade

Factors that could lead to an upgrade

(1) The company successfully expands into upstream manufacturing and assembly, maintaining consistently higher margins with larger revenue contribution by these activities;
(2) Develops its new business segments, including real estate and financial services, commanding higher margins and maintaining steady growth in new business transactions and market position that result in better credit metrics.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade

(1) Leverage and exposure to higher-risk assets increase materially, heightening balance sheet risks; or
(2) Profitability weakens significantly due to operational losses; or
(3) Liquidity risks rise substantially, such as a sharp decline in liquid assets insufficient to cover short-term obligations; or
(4) We view BID's capacity or willingness to provide support to have fallen materially.

Rating methodology

Financial Institutions Rating Methodology.

For more detailed information, please refer to our full credit rating methodology at: here

Credit rating history

Regulatory disclosures

For further specification of VIS Rating's Rating Symbols and Definitions, please see: here

BSI’s ownership stake in VIS rating: 0%
The ownership ratio of BSI held by VIS Rating’s staff: 0%
Cases in which analysts and credit rating council members cease their participation in the credit rating contract before the contract expires and the reason for the cessation: 0 

VIS Rating adheres to a stringent independence policy by current regulations governing the provision of credit rating services in Vietnam. This commitment extends to compliance with our conflicts-of-interest policy, aiming to uphold objectivity and independence when expressing opinions on credit ratings.
The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent(s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.
This rating is solicited.
Regulatory disclosures contained in this rating announcement apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.
Please see https://visrating.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the VIS Rating's legal entity that has issued the rating.
Please see the rating tab on the issuer/entity page on https://visrating.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating.

Analyst & Committee

Primary Analysts

Nguyễn Hà My, CFA
Nguyen Ha My, CFA
Sector Lead Analyst

Rating Committee Members

Simon Chen, CFA
Simon Chen, CFA
Head of Ratings & Research
Phan Duy Hưng, CFA, MBA
Phan Duy Hung, CFA, MBA
Senior Director - Head of Financial Institutions Ratings & Research
Nguyễn Đình Duy, CFA
Nguyen Dinh Duy, CFA
Director - Senior Analyst

Credit Rating Announcement Number

Vietnam Investors Service and Credit Rating Agency Joint Stock Company

Public credit rating announcement no: VN0101003060-001-171225

Share article
Download full PDF

Disclaimer

VIS Rating’s credit ratings, assessments, other opinions, and publications are not intended for use by non-professional investors and it would be reckless and inappropriate for non-professional investors to use VIS Rating’s credit ratings, assessments, other opinions or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

Discuss your credit rating needs

Contact VIS Rating to discuss credit rating solutions for your business

Explore credit rating results

Access VIS Rating’s published credit ratings for issuers and debt instruments in Vietnam

View rating results